Hosted websites will become read-only beginning in early 2024. At that time, all logins will be disabled, but hosted sites will remain on RootsWeb as static content. Website owners wishing to maintain their sites must migrate to a different hosting provider before 2024 (More info)
St. Clair County Circuit Court

St. Clair County Circuit Court
Microfilm Transcripts

April Term 1849

Page 220:

April Term AD 1849

At a Circuit Court Commenced and held at the Courthouse in the Town of Osceola in St. Clair County Missouri on Monday the 23rd day of April AD 1849 –
Present Foster P. Wright Circuit Judge
Chas. P. Bullock – Clerk
Zachariah Lilley – Sheriff

The Sheriff of the County of St. Clair returned here into Court the Venira for a grand inquest for the state of Missouri for the body of St. Clair County – the following named persons Householders of St. Clair county were sworn a grand Inquest Towit Harry C. Douglass foreman 2 James M. Breckenridge 3 Robert F. Gardner, 4 George W. McFarland, 5th Thomas Lessley, 6 William Whitley, 7 Isaac Culbertson, 8. William Pickering, 9. Enoch Lester 10 Wm. S. King – 11 Simeon C. Bruce, 12 Reubin Robertson, 13 Levi Gover, 14th Bennett Pitt 15 William B. Moore & 16 William Paxton, who having received their charge retired to Consider of their presentments.

State of Missouri – plff
vs
William E. Marlow – Deft
Indictment for disturbing a religious Congregation
Now at this day Comes the Defendant William E. Marlow the defendant as well as the Circuit Attorney who prosecutes for the state of Missouri And the said Defendant Says he is guilty in Manner And form as is charged against him in the said Indictment And throws himself upon the mercy of the Court, Whereupon the court doth find that the said Defendant is guilty in manner and form as charged against him in said Indictment And doth assess the fine at Two Dollars And fifty cents – Therefore it is considered by the Court that the Said plaintiff recover of the said Defendant the sum of Two Dollars and fifty cents so assessed as aforesaid together with her costs and charges in this behalf Expended and that she have thereof her writ of Execution.

State of Missouri – plff
vs
William McDaniel – Deft
Indc’t for assault with intent to Kill
Now at this day comes the said William McDaniel in his own proper person as well as the Circuit Attorney who prosecutes for the state of Missouri, And the said defendant for



Page 221:
April Term AD 1849

his plea in this behalf says he is not guilty in manner and form as is charged against him in this indictment and for his trial puts himself upon the country, and both parties being ready for trial comes a Jury Towit – Joseph Burk, William Snell, James Addington, James Casey, James Hampton, William T. Smarr, Harvey White, William Elkin, Eldrid Daniel, John Snell, James Preston and Hiram Short 12 good and lawful men elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue in this cause Joined who having heard the evidence and argument of counsel upon their oaths so say “We the Jury find the defendant guilty in manner and form as he stands charged in said indictment but that we cannot agree as to the punishment” Whereupon the court doth assess and declare the punishment to be that the said defendant pay a fine of Five Hundred dollars, and the said defendant being so convicted and found guilty of an assault with intent to Kill, he is by the Court sentenced to pay said fine of Five Hundred dollars. It is therefore considered ordered by the court that the state of Missouri have and recover of the Said William McDaniel the said sum of Five Hundred Dollars the fine assessed as aforesaid together with the Costs in this behalf laid out and expended and that she have thereof her writ of Execution. Whereupon the said defendant is by the court ordered into the custody of the sheriff untill said fine and costs are paid or he is otherwise discharged by due Course of law.

Alfred Wallace & Omicimus Evans – Plffs
vs
James Wilson, Saml H. Woodson & Zacery Smith – Defts
Execution & garnishment
Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attorney And by leave of the Court files herein their bill of Interogatories.

Ebenezer Gash
Vs
Alfred Gash admr of Wm. Gash decd and others heirs and distributors of sd decd
Now at this day comes the plff by his attorney and Suggests to the Court here that William Gash, James Gash and Elizabeth Gash are infants And have no guardians assigned them And upon motion of said



Page 222:
April Term AD 1849

plaintiff the Court doth order t hat Edward C. Dane be Appointed Guardian Ad litem for said infant defendants.

Ordered that Court adjourn untill Tomorrow Morn’g 9 Oclock. F.P. Wright

Tuesday Morning 9 Oclock Court met pursuant to adjournment.
Present as on yesterday

John C. Wyatt – Plff
vs
William Welch – Defendant
Petition on Debt
Now at this day Comes the Defendant by his attorney and by leave of the Court files herein his plea of general Issue to the said plffs declaration.

Charles P. Bullock
vs
William McDaniel
Execution on Transcript from Justices Court
Now at this day Comes Charles P. Bullock the plaintiff in this Cause And moves the court for leave that the former Sheriff John L. Trabern be permitted to amend his return upon said writ and to him leave is given which amendment being made by the said John L. Trabern, whereupon the said John L. Trabern former Sheriff of St. Clair County Aforesaid tenders to the Court here a deed by him executed to the said Chas. P. Bullock for the SE qr of NW qr Section 27 – SW fl qr of section 27 N of Sac River SE fl qr of Section 28 S of Sac River NE fl qr of Section 27 N of Sac River All in Township 37 and Range 26 in St. Clair County – who is Known to the Court to be the person whose name is subscribed to Said deed as having Executed the same and acknowledged the same to be his act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned.

State of Missouri
vs
Elkennah Cain
Indc’t for Keeping open Dram Shop on Sunday
Now at this Day comes the said defendant by his Attorney as well as the Circuit attorney who prosecutes for the State of Missouri And the Said



Page 223:
April Term AD 1849

Defendant for his plea says he is not guilty in manner and form as in the said Indictment is charged against him, And both parties being ready for trial Comes a Jury To Wit William A. Bagby, James Beale, Josiah Culbertson, William Culbertson, Harvey White, Henry T. Small, Columbus C. Corbin & Elisha H. Bell 8 good and lawful men Elected and sworn well and truly to try the issue in this Cause joined after hearing the evidence and argument of Counsel Returned into Court the following verdict “We the Jury find the Defendant guilty as charged in the indictment and do assess the fine to Two Dollars.” Therefore it is considered by the court that the said plaintiff recover against the said Defendant the aforesaid sum of Two Dollars so assessed by the Jury as aforesaid together with her costs and charges in this behalf laid out And Expended And that she have thereof her writ of Execution.

State of Missouri – plff
vs
Daniel B. McDonald – Deft
Indc’t for disturbing religious congregation
Now at this day Comes the parties by their attorneys and the plaintiff by her attorney files herein her motion to suppress the depositions in this Cause filed by the said Defendant which motion being seen heard and fully understood by the Court is by the court Sustained – Whereupon both parties being ready for trial Comes a Jury Towit Greenberry Culbertson, Stenson S. Sterns, William Barnett, James Dudley, Aquilla Frisbee, Alfred S. Gash, William Culbertson, and Garner Phillips 8 good and lawful men Agreed upon by the parties Elected and sworn well and truly to try the issue in this cause Joined upon their Oath returned into Court here the following Verdict “We the Jury find the defendant not guilty” Therefore it is considered by the court that the said Defendant from his recognizance be discharged and that he go hence thereof without day.

Elizabeth Y. Sims
vs
Robert G. Crockett
vs
Lewis R. Ashworth
Appeal
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney And upon his motion this cause is ordered to be dismissed – Therefore it is considered by the court that the Said Defendant recover of the Said plaintiff his Costs And Charges in this behalf expended and that he have thereof his writ of Execution – and upon motion of sd plff he has leave to withdraw the note sued upon.



Page 224:
April Term AD 1849

Pleasant M. Cox & Zachariah Lilley
vs
William C. Douglass
Appeal
upon Suggestion to the court that Zachariah Lilley one of the Defendants in this cause is the Sheriff of St. Clair County – It is Therefore ordered that Henry Pollard be appointed Elez’er in this cause.

The Grand Jury returned here into court a true bill against [space] and having no further business before them are by the court discharged – and it is ordered that Capias writs issue against the Said defendants directed to the Sheriff of St. Clair County returnable to the next term of this Court untill which time said Causes are ordered to be continued.

State of Missouri
vs
William Culbertson
Indictment for Trespass on 16th Section Township 31 Range 25
Now at this day Comes the said William Culbertson in his own proper person as well as the Said Circuit attorney who prosecutes for the state of Missouri, And the said William Culbertson Says he is guilty in manner and form as in said indictment is Charged against him and for his trial puts himself upon the Mercy of the court – Whereupon the court doth find the sd deft guilty & assess the fine of One Dollar – Therefore it is considered by the court that the said plaintiff recover against the said defendant the sum of One Dollar for his fine So assessed as aforesaid together with the Costs and Charges in this behalf laid out and Expended And that Execution issue therefor.

Ordered that Court adjourn untill Tomorrow morning 9 O clock. F.P. Wright



Page 225:
April Term AD 1849

Wednesday Morning 9 Oclock – Court met pursuant to adjournment.
Present as on Yesterday.

Alfred Wallace and Omicimus Evans
Vs
James N. Wilson, Samuel H. Woodson & Jabez Smith
Execution & garnishment
Now at this day again comes the plaintiffs by their attorney and the said Samuel H. Woodson and Jabez Smith being Solemnly Called Comes not but makes default whereupon the said action of the said plaintiffs against the said Defendants Samuel H. Woodson and Jabez Smith upon the garnishment aforesaid remains undefended and whereas the said plaintiffs ought to recover of the said Defendants Saml H. Woodson and Jabez Smith their Debt and Damages on occasion of the premises, It is therefore Considered by the court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said Defendants Woodson & Smith their debt and Damages. And the court Doth order that a writ of inquiry issue in this Cause returnable to the next term of this court untill which time this cause is ordered to be continued.

Wm. J. Mays Adm’r of Chas. [nothing else is written]

Julian Cosall – Plff
vs
Wm. Waldo – Deft
Petition in Debt
Now at this day Comes the parties by their Attorneys, and the defendant by his Attorney moves the Court to withdraw his plea of garnishment in this Cause filed and to him leave is given whereupon the action of the said Plaintiff against the said defendant remains undefended, and where as it manifestly appears to the Court here that the said Plaintiff ought to recover against said defendant the sum of Five Hundred Dollars, and Thirty Dollars and 57 Cents for his debt also the sum of Seven dollars for his damages and Six Cents by way of Interest. Therefore it is Considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover against the Said Deft the aforesaid sum of Five hundred thirty Dollars & 57 c for his debt and Seven Dollars & Six Cents for his damages together with his Costs and Charges in this behalf laid out and expended and that he have thereof his writ of Execution.

Pleasant M. Cox & Zachariah Lilley – Plaintiff
vs
Wm. C. Douglass – Defendant
Appeal
Now at this day Comes the parties by their attorneys



Page 226:
April Term AD 1849

and on motion of the defendant by his attorney and by Consent of the Plaintiff this Cause is Ordered to be Continued untill the next Term of this Court at the Defendants Costs.

State of Missouri
Vs
Wm. McDaniel
Indc’t for an Assault with intent to Kill and Conviction Thereon.
Now at this Comes Again the Said Wm. McDaniel in his Own proper person who was during this Term of the Court and on Monday last Convicted with an Assault with intent to Kill one John Loyd and Sentenced to pay a fine of Five hundred dollars, and files here in Court his petition praying the Court to Commute said fine to imprisonment in lieu of said fine, Whereupon the Court upon due Consideration thereon had, doth sentence the said Wm. McDaniel and he is by the Court sentenced to imprisonment in the County Jail for the Term of Fifteen days which Term of imprisonment is to be considered as Commenced on Monday last the day on which said def’t was rendered in Custody of the Sheriff, on the account of the non payment of said fine and the Clerk of the Court is directed to Certify a Coppy of this Order to the Sheriff of St. Clair County to be by him Carryed into effect.

State of Missouri
Vs
Elcanah Cain, Spencer Corbin, David S. Corbin, James Corbin, Dabney Dade, Wm. Gash, James McMin, Burtrand Weidemeyer, Henry Boatman, Samuel P. Hodges, E.B. Bunch, James Barr and William Anderson.
Indictment for disturbing the peace of a Family in the night time
Now at this day Comes William Gash and James McMin Two of the defendants in their own proper persons as well as the Circuit Attorney who prosecutes for the State of Missouri, and the said defendants Wm. Gash and Jas. McMin for their plea in this behalf say they are guilty in manner and form as charged against them in Said Indictment and for their trial throw themselves upon the Mercy of the Court whereupon the Court do find that said defendants are guilty in manner and form as Charged against them in said Indictment, and the Court doth assess a fine of One Dollar each therefore it is Considered of the Court that said Plaintiff recover against said defendants



Page 227:
April Term AD 1849

Wm. Gash and James McMin the sum of One dollar each so assessed by the Court as aforesaid together with the costs and charges in this behalf expended and that she have her writs of Execution.

State of Missouri – Plaintiff
vs
Robert Hester – Defendant
Indc’t for Selling Stray Cow
Now at this day comes Robert Hester the defendant in his own proper person as well as the Circuit Attorney who prosecutes for the state of Missouri, and the said defendant Robert Hester for his plea in this behalf, says he is guilty in manner and form as charged against him in said Indc’t and for his trial throws himself upon the mercy of the Court whereupon the court do find that said defendant is guilty in manner and form as charged against him in said Indc’t and the Court doth assess a fine of Eight dollars therefore it is considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover against said defendant Robert Hester the sum of Eight dollars so assessed by the Court as aforesaid together with the Costs and Charges in this behalf expended and that she have her writ of Execution.

Ordered that all Causes and motions not otherwise disposed of be continued untill the next Term of this Court.

Ordered that Court adjourn untill Court in Cause.
F.P. Wright

 

 

Back