Hosted websites will become read-only beginning in early 2024. At that time, all logins will be disabled, but hosted sites will remain on RootsWeb as static content. Website owners wishing to maintain their sites must migrate to a different hosting provider before 2024 (More info)
St. Clair County Circuit Court

St. Clair County Circuit Court
Microfilm Transcripts

October Term 1846

Page 182:

October Term AD 1846

At a Circuit Court Commenced and held at the Court house in the Town of Osceola in St. Clair County in the State of Missouri on Monday the 12th day of October A.D. 1846.
Present Foster P. Wright Circuit Judge
Chas. A. Bullock Clerk
Zachariah Lilley Sheriff

The Sheriff of St. Clair County returned here into Court the Venira for a grand inquest for the state of Missouri for the body of St. Clair County from which were sworn and impannelled the following named persons To Wit Hugh Hall foreman – Bennett Pitt, Randolph Huntley, James Addington, Thomas N. Hendley, Moses Preston, Hezekiah Thompson, Elijah S. Terry, Saml T. Weir, Uriah L. Sutherland, Isaac Culbertson, Robert Anderson, Joseph Hurnden, Richard Crenshaw, Harlen Hays, Wm. Whitley and Benjamin H. Moore 17 good and lawful men who having received their Charge retired to Consider of their presentments.

William L. Vaughan & Wm. H. Clark – plffs
vs
Luther Caton – Defendant
Debt and attachment
Now at this day Comes the plaintiffs by their Attorney and files herein his aplication to the said Defendants second plea.

Edward H. Hubbard – Plff
vs
Warren C. Heath – Deft
Replevin
Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney and files herein his motion to Cansel the replevin Bond in this Cause filed And to file a new Bond and by Consent of the Defendant by his Attorney leave is granted him and it is ordered that the same be filed on Tomorrow.

The State of Missouri – Plff
vs
Henry Pollard – Deft
Indct for Keeping a Gaming house
Now at this day Comes the parties by their attornies and the Defendant by his attorney for his plea in this behalf says he is not Guilty in manner and form as charged in the Said Indictment – And both parties being ready for trial Comes a Jury Towit James Carry, John S. Wyatt, Wm. Moore, Albert Sheldon, David A. Bunch, Jno. C. Greenwell, Joseph Culbertson, Richard B. Tuck,



Page 183:
October Term 1846

James Clarkson, John M. Abel, Andrew J. Krain, Lewis F. Reese 12 good and lawful men well and truly elected tried and sworn to try the issue in this Cause Joined after hearing the evidence return into Court and report that they Cannot and one of the Jury being sick and unable to try said Cause the Jury are by the Court discharged.

Abraham Stow – Plff & appellor
vs
Wm. Denson – Deft & appellant
Appeal
Now at this day Comes the parties by their attornies And on Motion of the Defendant This Cause is Ordered to be dismissed – Therefore it is Considered by the Court that the said defendant recover of the Said Plaintiff his Costs and Charges in this behalf laid out and Expended.

State of Missouri – Plff
vs
Albert Sheldon – Deft
Indct for not Keeping road district in repair
Now at this day Comes the parties by their attorneys and the said Defendant for his plea in this behalf says he is not guilty as in manner and form in charges against him in the said Indictment – whereupon Came a Jury To Wit: Robert F. Gardner, Daniel Cline, John Able, Wm. B. Wilkerson, Andrew Forest, John C. Greenwell, David A. Bunch, Washington Whitton, Harry C. Douglass, James Curry, John J. Wyatt and King Allen – 12 good and lawful men Elected tried and sworn to try the issue in this Cause Joined – after hearing the evidence returned into Court and reported that they Could not agree – who are by the Court discharged.

Ordered that Court adjourn untill Tomorrow morning 8 of the Clock.
F.P. Wright

Tuesday morning 8 Oclock
Court met pursuant to adjournment
Present as on Yesterday



Page 184:
October Term AD 1846

Edward H. Hubbard – plff
vs
Warren C. Heath – Deft
Replevin
Now at this day Comes the plaintiff by his attorney and files herein his Addition Bond – and the defendant by his attorney files herein his motion to suppress the depositions in this cause Taken by the said plaintiff which motion being seen and heard and fully understood by the Court is by the Court Sustained – And the plaintiff by his attorney files herein his motion for a Continuance of this Cause And for good Cause shown this cause is ordered to be Continued untill the next term of this Court at the plaintiffs Costs.

State of Missouri – plff
vs
Henry Pollard – Deft
Indictment for Keeping gaming house
Now at this day Comes the parties by their attorneys & the defendant for his plea in this behalf says he is not guilty in manner and form as in the said indictment is alledged against him – And both parties being ready for trial Comes a Jury Towit – John C. Greenwell, Washington Whitton, Daniel Cline, Henry Reece, Wm. B. Wilkerson, James D. Gray, James Curry, Hugh Barnett, John T. McClain, Wm. M. Cox, Wm. J. Weir and John M. Able 12 good and lawful men Elected and sworn well and truly to try the issue in this Cause Joined after hearing the evidence and argument of Counsel returned here into Court the following Verdict To Wit – We the Jury find the Defendant guilty as Charged in the Indictment and fine him five Dollars Therefore it is Considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the sum of five Dollars for his fine so assessed by the Jury as aforesaid together with his Costs and Charges in this behalf laid out and Expended And that she have thereof her writ of Execution.

State of Missouri – Plffs
vs
George Seeder – Deft
Indictment for bartering with an Indian for a gun
Now at this day Comes the Circuit attorney who prosecutes for the state of Missouri And says he will not further prosecute this Indictment Therefore it is Considered by the Court that the Indictment be dismissed and the said Defendant go hence thereof without day.



Page 185:
October Term 1846

State of Missouri – Plff
vs
Samuel P. Hedges, Alexander Moore, Elkennah Cain & Robert Beale – deft
Indct for Gaiming
Now at this day Comes the Circuit attorney who prosecutes for the State of Missouri as well as the said Defendants Samuel P. Hedges, Alexander Moore and Elkennah Cain in their own proper person and say that they are guilty in manner and form as Charged in the said indictment against them and submit their Cases to the Court whereupon the Court doth fine them ten Dollars Each Therefore it is Considered by the Court that the said plaintiffs recover of the said defendants Saml P. Hedges, Alexander Moore and Elkennah Cain Each the sum of ten Dollars so assessed as aforesaid – together with her Costs and Charges in this behalf Laid out and Expended and that she have thereof her writ of Execution and whereas it appears from the return of the sheriff upon the Capias in this Cause issued that the said defendant Robert K. Beale Cannot be found in St. Clair County – upon motion of the Circuit attorney it is ordered that an Alias Capias do issue directed to the Sheriff of Bates County against the said Beale returnable to the next term of this Court untill which time this Cause is Continued.

State of Missouri – plff
vs
Henry Pollard, Elkennah Cain, Joseph Barteaux & Gabriel Nash – Defts
Indct for Gaiming
Now at this day Comes the Circuit attorney who prosecutes for the State of Missouri as well as the said defendants Henry Pollard, Elkennah Cain and Joseph Burteaux who say they are guilty in manner and form as in the said indictment is Charged against them and submits their Cases to the Court – Whereupon the Court doth assess a fine of ten dollars each Therefore it is Considered by the Court that the said Plaintiff recover of the said Defendants Henry Pollard and Elkennah Cain and Joseph Burteaux the Sum of ten Dollars each together with her Costs and Charges in this behalf laid out and Expended and that she have thereof her writ of Execution – and it Appearing to the Court that the Capias in this cause issued could not be served upon the said Defendant Gabriel Nash upon motion of said Plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered that an alias writ do issue against said defendant



Page 186:
October Term 1846

Gabriel Nash directed to the Sheriff of St. Clair County returnable to the next term of this Court, untill which time this Cause is ordered to be Continued as to the said Defendant Gabriel Nash.

State of Missouri – Plff
vs
Elkennah Cain – Deft
Indct for Keeping Gaiming house
Now at this day Comes the Circuit attorney who prosecutes for the State of Missouri as well as the said Defendant and for his plea says he is not guilty in manner and form as in the said indictment against him is charged, and both parties being ready for trial Comes a Jury Towit, William Harry, John S. Wyatt, Bector Jarnigan, Elijah L. Harper, Wm. N. Houston, Andrew Foust, Hugh E. Weir, John C. Greenwell, John Tally, Green Harper, Wm. Simons and David A. Bunch 12 good and lawful men Elected and sworn well and truly to try the issue in this Cause after hearing the evidence and argument of Counsel returned into Court and reported that they Could not agree who were by the Court discharged.

The State of Missouri – Plff
vs
Benjamin K. Wilkerson – Deft
Indct for giving liquor to an Indian
Now at this day Comes the Circuit attorney who prosecutes for the State of Missouri And says he will not further prosecute this Indictment. Therefore it is ordered by the Court that this Cause be dismissed and the Said defendant from his recognizance be discharged And that he go Thereof Without day.

James Browder admr of the estate of Jonas Heath deceased – Plff
vs
James H. Lay admr of the estate of Peter Ashley deceased – Deft
Assumpsit
Now at this day Comes the parties by their attorneys and both parties being ready for trial Comes a Jury To Wit, Reuben S. Nance, Henry Reece, Warren C. Heath, Simeon Poston, David A. Bunch, John M. Abel, Wm. McDaniel, Bennett Jones, Henry Pollard, George Reece, Andrew Forest and John S. McConnell 12 good and lawful men Elected and sworn well and truly to try the issues in this Cause Joined, after hearing the Evidence and argument of Counsel returned here into Court the following Verdict, “We the Jury find the plaintiff and assess the damages at Seven hundred



Page 187:
October Term 1846

and Eighty Dollars” – Therefore it is considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said Estate of Peter Ashley deceased Defendant the sum of Seven Hundred and Eighty Dollars so assessed by the Jury as aforesaid, together with his Costs and Charges in this behalf laid out and Expended and that he have thereof his writ of Execution.

Edward H. Hubbard
vs
[nothing else is written]

The State of Missouri – plff
vs
Albert Sheldon – Deft
Indct for not Keeping road district in repair
Now at this day again Comes the parties here unto Court and both parties being ready for trial Comes A Jury To Wit: Bennett Pitt, John S. McConnell, Thomas N. Hendley, Benjaman K. Wilkerson, Wm. Kelso, Carlin Hays, John Amblin, Bennett Jones, Robert Anderson, William Willett, Mordeca Hausborough And Henry Reece 12 good and lawful men Elected and Sworn well and truly Elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue in this Cause after hearing the Evidence and arguments of Counsel returns here into Court the following Verdict, We the Jury find the defendant not guilty as in manner and form Charged in the indictment Therefore it is considered by the Court that the said Defendant from his recognizance be discharged, and that he go thereof without day.

Sidney C. Dean – Plff & appeller
vs
David L. Hamilton – Deft & appellant
Appeal
Now at this day Comes the parties by their attorneys And the Plaintiff by his attorney files herein his motion for a Continuance of this Cause and the said Defendant by his attorney agrees to said Continuance at the said plaintiffs costs upon condition that the said Plaintiff agree that the Depositions taken in the Cause by either party shall be read in evidence without exception, to which the said plaintiff agree – Therefore it is ordered by the Court that this Cause be Continued untill the next term of this Court at the said plaintiffs Costs.



Page 188:
October Term A.D. 1846

James Gardner
vs
Alborn D. Abston – dft
and Barnett Boner – garnisher
Inquiry of Damages upon Garnishment
Now at the day Comes the said plaintiff by his Attorney, and the said defendant Abston and the said Garnisher being Solemnly Called Comes not, but makes default, and whereas it appears to the Court here that the said plaintiff ought to have and recover of the Said garnisher Boner the sum of thirteen dollars & 94 ½ cents, on occasion of the premises, And whereas it also manifestly appears to the Court here that the said Abston is indebted to the Said Gardner in the Said sum of thirteen dollars & 94 ½ cents and that the said Boner is indebted to the said Abston in the sum of thirteen dollars 94 ½ Cents therefore it is Considered by the Court that the said James Gardner have and recover from the Said Barnett Boner the said sum of thirteen Dollars & 94 ½ cts and that he have execution therefore the Indebtedness from the said Boner to the said Abston being a note executed to A.B. Howard for the sum of Twenty five Dollars being interest at the rates of ten per centum per annum payable on demand and executed the 20th day of August AD 1844, and transferred to the said Abston by the said Howard by delivery – and it is further ordered that the Clerk enter a Credit on said note for the Amount of this Judgment and that the said defendant Abston have leave to withdraw the note.

Joseph W. Cox Admr of the Estate of Wm. McClanahan decd
vs
Sarah E. McClanahan mdon
Petition to set off Indct
Now at this day comes the said Joseph W. Cox administrator of the Estate of said William McClanan deceased and filed here in court his petition setting forth among other things that said Sarah E. McCanahan widow of decd Wm. McClanahan deceased is intitled to decree in the west ½ of the north west quarter of section No. 4 in Township No. 37 & Range



Page 189:
October Term 1846

No. 25 containing 86 11/100 acres and the east ½ of the N.E. qr of Section 25 of Township 37 & Range 25 west containing 81 87/100 acres and the east half of the North West q4 of Section No. 4 Township 37 & Range 25 west containing 81 25/100 acres praying the assessment of land, And the said petitioner having proved to the satisfaction of the court here that he has given twenty days previous notice in writing to said Sarah E. McClanahan of his intention Application to this court for said assessment of dower in said order – and the said Sarah E. McCanahan not appearing but herein makes default whereupon it is ordered by the court that dower ought to be assessed of And therefore the Court doth appoint Wm. C. Douglass, E.A. Browning and Thomas F. Wright Commissioners to assign said Dower – And afluenced on this day the said Commissioners came into court & make their report setting forth that they do not think the land susceptible of division without motion or injury.

The grand Jury returned here into Court a true bill against Joseph Conly for selling liquors without license also a second Bill against said Conley for selling liquors without license – and having no further business before them and by the Court discharged.

Ordered that Court adjourn untill Tomorrow morning 9 Oclock.
F.P. Wright

Wednesday morning 9 Oclock
Court met pursuant to adjournment
Present as on Yesterday



Page 190:
October Term AD 1846

Henry Whitton – Appelant
vs
Elizabeth Y. Sams – Appeller
Appeal from the County Court on granting tellers of Administration on the Estate of Burch A. Sams decd
Now at this day come the parties by their Attorneys and the said Henry Whitton by his attorney files herein his motion suggesting a determination of the Record and praying that the same may be perfected, and upon further motion and by leave of the court Withdraws the same – Whereupon both parties being ready for trial this Cause is submitted to the Court – Whereupon the Court after hearing the Evidence And mature deliberation thereon had doth order that the order of the County Court Granting letters of Administration on said estate to Elizabeth Y. Sams be affirmed – Therefore it is Considered by the Court that the said Elizabeth Y. Sams recover of the said Henry Whitton her Costs and Charges on this behalf laid out and expended and that she have thereof her writ of Execution.

Bank of the State of Missouri
vs
Thomas F. Wright, Wm. Brown and John C. Greenwell
Assumpsit
Now at this day Comes the parties by their attorneys And the defendant by their attorney And by leave of the Court files herein their plea of Non Assumpsit.

George Dixen admr. of the Estate of John Walters decd
vs
George Trotter
Appeal
Now at this day comes the parties by their attorneys and both parties being ready for trial and neither party requiring a jury this cause is submitted to the Court Whereupon the court after hearing the evidence do find that the said Defendant is indebted to the said plaintiff the sum of $31.62 cents for his debt and $31.65 for his damages by way of Interest, Therefore it is Considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said Defendant the aforesaid sums of $31.62 Cents for his debt And $31.65 for her damages so assessed as aforesaid together with his Costs And Charges in this behalf laid out and Expended and that he have Thereof his writ of Execution.



Page 191:
October Term 1846

Bank of the State of Missouri – plff
vs
Thomas Piper – Deft
Assumpsit
Now at this day Comes the Plaintiff by his attorney and the Defendant being Solemnly Called Comes not but makes default, and the plaintiff by her attorney Suggests to the Court here that the debt and damages in the said declaration mentioned have been since the Commencement of this suit fully satisfied and paid off – Therefore it is Considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendant her costs and Charges in this behalf laid out and expended and that she have thereof her writ of Execution.

Alexander Moore – plff
vs
Luther Caton – Deft
Debt & attachment
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by their attorneys and shows to the court here that the Order of publication made at the last term of this Court has been published according to law, and the said Defendant being Solemnly Called comes not but makes default. Whereupon the said return of the said plaintiff against the said Defendant remains undefended And whereas it is suggested and proved and manifestly appears to the court here that the said plaintiff ought to recover against the said Defendant for debt the sum of Seven Dollars and twenty five cents. Therefore it is considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover against the said defendant the aforesaid sum of Seven dollars and twenty five cents so assessed as aforesaid together with his costs and charges in this behalf laid out and expended and that he have thereof his writ of Execution.

Alexander Moore
vs
Luther Caton
Debt And attachment
Now at this day comes the parties by their attorneys and both parties being ready for trial this Cause is Submitted to the court whereupon the Court after hearing the evidence doth find for the plaintiff the sum of Seven Dollars and twenty five Cents for his debt Therefore it is considered by the court that the Said plaintiff recover of the said defendant the aforesaid Sum of Seven Dollars and twenty five Cents So Assessed by the court as aforesaid together with his costs and Charges in this behalf laid out and expended and that he have thereof his writ of Execution.



Page 192:
October Term AD 1846

State of Missouri – plff
vs
Joseph Conley – Deft
Indct for dram Shop Keeping
Now at this day comes the circuit attorney who prosecutes for the State of Missouri And upon his motion it is ordered that a writ of Capias issue against the said Defendant directed to the Sheriff of St. Clair County, returnable to the next term of this Court, untill which time this cause is ordered to be continued.

State of Missouri – plff
vs
Joseph Conley – Deft
Indct for dram shop Keeping
Now at this day comes the circuit attorney who prosecutes for the State of Missouri - And upon his motion it is ordered that a writ of Capias issue against the Said Defendant directed to the Sheriff of St. Clair County returnable to the next term of this Court untill which time this cause is Ordered to be Continued.

Now at this day comes Zachariah Lilley Sheriff of St. Clair County and tenders to the Court here his official Bond for approval, which bond is by the Court Examined and approved and ordered to be filed.

Wm. H. Clark & Wm. L. Vaughn
vs
Luther Caton
Debt and Attachment
Now at this day comes the parties by their attorneys and both parties being ready for trial and neither party requiring a Jury this cause is Submitted to the Court, Whereupon the court after hearing the evidence doth find that the said Defendant is indebted to the said plaintiffs the sum of twelve Dollars and thirty nine Cents for his debt also the sum of four Dollars and Sixty Cents for his damages by way of Interest – Therefore it is Considered by the Court that the said Plaintiffs recover against the said defendants the aforesaid sum of Twelve Dollars and thirty nine Cents for his debt also the Sum of four Dollars and Sixty Cents for his Damages so assessed as aforesaid together with his costs and charges in this behalf laid out and Expended and that he have thereof his writ of Execution.

David A. Bunch – plff
vs
Daniel Cline – Deft
Appeal



Page 193:
October Term AD 1846

Now at this day comes the parties by their attorneys, And the defendant by his attorney files herein his motion for a Continuance of This Cause, And for good cause shown to the Court it is ordered that this cause be continued untill the next term of this court at the said Defendants costs.

Ordered that all Causes and motions not otherwise disposed of be continued untill the next term of this Court.

Ordered that Court adjourn untill Court in course.
F.P. Wright
Cir Judge

 

 

Back